Over the next year Facebook will implement changes on how personal data is used.
Read article
Monday, August 31, 2009
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
The overuse of the word "participatory"
Here’s a 2 minutes video from Kru Research (lobal think tank focused on "empowered patients") showing that the age of "participatory medicine" has begun.
I'm wondering if they can call this change on applied medicine "participatory" - they are not designing anything new and was there a lot of 'collaboration' with the patient? Offering websites that allow patients to inform themselves doesn't create consensus.
see video
Maybe it should be called: empower the patient to be able to read up on what they have been told by the doctor, but not necessarily understood or forgotten.
I'm wondering if they can call this change on applied medicine "participatory" - they are not designing anything new and was there a lot of 'collaboration' with the patient? Offering websites that allow patients to inform themselves doesn't create consensus.
see video
Maybe it should be called: empower the patient to be able to read up on what they have been told by the doctor, but not necessarily understood or forgotten.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
SMS PhD: 'pointless' text messages analysed
A PhD has just been completed looking at the language of txts. Interesting emphasis on pointlessness in the title of the article, though whether this is actually important in the PhD itself is unclear.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/mobile-phones/5982272/SMS-Phd-pointless-text-messages-analysed.html
Why does pointlessness matter? It may be (or may not), as we have said before, that older users expect there to be an extrinsic purpose in electronic communication, whereas younger users do not. I don't know if this researcher looked at the age of the texters, but might be worth asking.
See that book I keep mentioning: Robin Dunbar, Grooming Gossip and the Evolution of Language.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/mobile-phones/5982272/SMS-Phd-pointless-text-messages-analysed.html
Why does pointlessness matter? It may be (or may not), as we have said before, that older users expect there to be an extrinsic purpose in electronic communication, whereas younger users do not. I don't know if this researcher looked at the age of the texters, but might be worth asking.
See that book I keep mentioning: Robin Dunbar, Grooming Gossip and the Evolution of Language.
Monday, August 10, 2009
Article in Interactions magazine
This might be useful in itself or have some useful pointers:
Supporting healthy aging with new technologies
Brian D. Jones
Claudia RĂ©bola Winegarden
Wendy A. Rogers
interactions
Volume 16, Issue 4 (July + August 2009)
The Waste Manifesto
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1551986.1551996
Supporting healthy aging with new technologies
Brian D. Jones
Claudia RĂ©bola Winegarden
Wendy A. Rogers
interactions
Volume 16, Issue 4 (July + August 2009)
The Waste Manifesto
SECTION: The value of culture
Pages 48-51
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1072-5520
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1551986.1551996
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)